Online assessment for the final year medical students during COVID-19 pandemics; the exam quality and students' performance

Abstract

Author(s): Bahaeldin Hassan*, Ayed A. Shati, Abdulaziz Alamri, Ayyub Patel, Ali Alsuheel Asseri, Muhammed Abid, Saleh M. Al-Qahatani and Ismaeel Satti

Background: Saudi Arabia responded to corona virus (COVID 19) pandemic earlier, the decision of lockdown taken in March 2020, and education and assessment were continued through E-learning since that time. Objectives: We aimed to assess the quality of online MCQs test taken by final medical students after COVID 19 pandemic and to review student’s performance in online assessment. Methods: This study was carried out in the college of medicine, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, participants were undergraduate final year medical students who completed their four major clinical courses. Item analysis parameters of the online MCQs test were compared with the item analysis parameters of the paper-based tests. Paper-based tests assessed the cohort of students in semester one before COVID 19 pandemic lockdown. The overall student’s performance on classical, face to face assessment was compared with the performance on an online assessment. Chi-square test was used P values < 0:05 considered as statistically significant. Results: In two courses out of four, the test reliability of online MCQs tests improved significantly compared with paper-based tests. Three courses out of four showed significantly increased average discrimination indices among the online MCQs items. The average difficulty indices of all courses increased significantly in online MCQs tests. We observed that out of a maximum raw score of 100, the mean student’s score for online assessment in three courses was significantly higher than that for traditional assessment. Conclusion: we studied the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on assessment of final year medical students. Online MCQs approved to be more reliable, better discrimination ability, but easier than paper-based examination. The overall student’s performance in theoretical and practical assessment was significantly improved in online assessment.

Share this article

Editors List

  • S.SREEDHAR

    Submitted PhD thesis in Biotechnology at GITAM University, Vizag.

  • Yousef Alomi

    Yousef Alomi
    The Past Head, General Administration of Pharmaceutical Care at Ministry of Health,
    Saudi Arabia Critical Care/TPN
    Clinical Pharmacist Ministry of Health,
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  • Osamu Tanaka

    Osamu Tanaka
    Assistant Professor,
    Department of Radiation Oncology
    Asahi University Hospital
    Gifu city, Gifu, Japan

  • Maher Abdel Fattah Al-Shayeb

    Department of Surgical Sciences, Ajman University, UAE

  • Andrzej Zdziennicki

    Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Lodz, I Clinic of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology (Lodz, Poland)

Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 61

Onkologia i Radioterapia received 61 citations as per Google Scholar report

Onkologia i Radioterapia peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Scimago
  • SCOPUS
  • MIAR
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • Medical Project Poland
  • PUBMED
  • Cancer Index
  • Gdansk University of Technology, Ministry Points 20