Review - Onkologia i Radioterapia ( 2025) Volume 19, Issue 8

Germ cell tumours of the mediastinum: an analysis and comprehensive update research on their pathological, clinical, and molecular characteristics

Ramesh Manmal Oswal1*, Kavina Ganapathy2, Prabhat Sharma3, Vikram Shete4, Heena Baria5 and Sudhanshu Dev6
 
1Department of Pathology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Maharashtra, India
2Department of Biotechnology, School of Sciences, (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
3Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India
4Department of UGDX, ATLAS SkillTech University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
5Parul Institute of Nursing, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
6Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, India
 
*Corresponding Author:
Ramesh Manmal Oswal, Department of Pathology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Maharashtra, India, Email: drrameshoswal@gmail.com

Received: 01-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. OAR-24-145479; Accepted: 12-Sep-2024, Pre QC No. OAR-24-145479(PQ); Editor assigned: 04-Aug-2025, Pre QC No. OAR-24-145479(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Aug-2025, QC No. OAR-24-145479(Q); Revised: 24-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. OAR-24-145479(R); Published: 31-Aug-2025

Abstract

The most frequent Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumours (EGCTs) are Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumours (MGCTs), which tend to develop in men and most frequently appear in the anterior mediastinum. Those with Klinefelter syndrome and probably other genetic diseases are also more likely to receive MGCTs. It is believed that MGCTs, like GCTs at other extragonadal locations, develop from germ cells that migrate incorrectly along the midline during development. The seminomatous and non-seminomatous GCT subtypes of MGCTs are categorized similarly to those seen in the testes. Non-seminomatous MGCTs include embryonal carcinoma, mature or immature teratoma, pure Yolk Sac Tumours (YSTs), mixed GCTs, and choriocarcinoma with any combination of GCT types, including semi-noma. Seminomatous MGCTs are pure semi-noma. Hematologic or somatic cancers may potentially develop concurrently with a primary MGCT. Except for benign teratomas, which simply require surgical removal without chemotherapy, treatment involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection of the remaining tumour. It highlights and update the molecular, clinical, and pathologic aspects of MGCTs in this review. There includes a discussion of the Immuno Histochemical (IHC) characteristics of each tumour type and other diagnostic methods.

Keywords

clinical characters, Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumours (MGCTs), pathologic characters, treatment, molecular characters

Introduction

The gonads are the primary source of Germ Cell Tumours (GCTs). The testes are the source of more than 90% of GCTs. Moreover, primary extragonadal GCTs account for just 2%-5% of GCTs and are most frequently seen in the mediastinum and retroperitoneum [1]. Their histologies is classified as semi-noma and non-semi-noma and are identical to those of their testicular counterparts. Extragonadal EGCTs still have no recognized cause. There are two main hypotheses. One hypothesis is that embryonic progenitors of germ cells migrate incorrectly and persist in atypical sites. The second holds that throughout development, germ cells are extensively dispersed and eventually give rise to malignancies. About 1% to 3% of all adult GCTs are PMGCTs, making them very uncommon. The development of primary mediastinal semi-noma is rather sluggish and covert [2]. When a primary mediastinal non-semi-noma is first detected, 85%-95% of patients already have at least one metastatic lesion. Moreover, non-semi-nomas have a higher chance of metastasizing than seminos. A large tumour or invasion causes symptoms in more than 90% of patients. Dyspnea, dysphagia, hoarseness, chest discomfort, and cough are the most prevalent symptoms, albeit they are typically vague. Other symptoms that some people may experience include weight loss, fever, weariness, and superior vena cava syndrome [3].

The Serum Tumour Markers (STMs) Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (β-HCG), Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP), and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) are shared by PMGCTs and gonadal GCTs. Moreover, both extragonadal and gonadal GCTs exhibit the recognizable genetic aberration known as isochromosome 12p [4]. PMGCTs and gonadal GCTs have comparable Computed Tomography (CT) imaging properties. In a CT scan, semi- noma and non-semi-noma might differ from one another. With the application of contrast, the primary mediastinal semi-noma exhibits homogenous soh tissue attenuation and homogeneous amplification. Primary mediastinal non-semi-noma, on the other hand, is heterogeneous, has uneven boundaries, and may expand into nearby structures [5]. In contrast, non-semi-noma PMGCTs are difficult to treat due to decreased cisplatin sensitivity and a lack of other therapy choices in the first and later lines. For a better treatment strategy, research is being conducted to uncover biomarkers and actionable targets. This essay provides a thorough assessment of the literature on mediastinal germ cell cancers.

LITERATURE REVIEW

In research, 36 male patients with Somatic-Type Malignancies (STM) had their GCTs analysed using a multi-platform molecular approach [6]. Sarcoma and neuroectodermal tumours of the embryonic type, each found in 61% and 31% of patients, correspondingly, were the most prevalent histological forms of SM. To guide how to handle central nervous system germ cell tumours, the author of combined clinical, histological, and genetic data [7]. Understanding of the pathophysiology of the puzzling tumour would be improved by the results about clinical and genetic heterogeneity. To summarize the similarities and differences between the uncommon illness and its gonadal analogs, research intend to compile all molecular data described in the condition [8]. It was currently unclear what mechanisms were at play in their progression, increased resistance to conventional therapy, and modes of development. Few numbers of data were described in the literature for MGCTs, and appropriate multi- omics analysis was currently absent. Histopathological analysis, including diagnostic, grading, immunohistochemistry, and genetic profiling, were discussed in [9]. Th e ca ncer gr oup and its associated epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment options were also described briefly. The primary emphasis, however, was on analysing the pathologic evaluation process for cancers before and aher treatment. At a high-volume facility, patients with PMNSGCTs who were having resection and multidisciplinary therapy were studied for management methods, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and OS [10]. With a 22% long-term Survival Rate (SR), patients receiving second-line chemotherapy followed by resection have a bad prognosis.

Targeted immunohistochemistry and molecular characterization techniques have significantly enhanced diagnostic biomarkers over the last several decades. The majority of indicators weren't completely sensitive or specific despite these recent developments. In research, they provide a summary of tissue-based biomarkers important to the pathologist, with an emphasis on real-world diagnostic challenges relating to testicular GCT and Sex Cord-Stromal Malignancies (SCST) [11]. The purpose o f the research was offered an update on the diagnostic features of malignant ovarian GCT, including their clinical, morphological, immunocytochemical, and, where appropriate, molecular characteristics [12]. Also included are somatic malignancies that contain germ cells, and the new pluripotency indicators that have improved diagnostic accuracy. A late-adolescent teenage boy with a chemotherapy-resistant residual cancerous tumour and an elevated Vasculogenic Mesenchymal Tumour (VMT) was described in the paper [13]. The kid underwent treatment for a mediastinal mixed GCT that included contained YST. The discovery that VMT showed a partially YST-like immunophenotype and inherits the genetic changes of pre-existing mixed GCT might be a factor in the severity of its clinical manifestations.

METHODOLOGY

Using various combinations of mediastinal MGCTs, clinical aspects, prognostic factors, therapy, and molecular features, relevant publications published between 1976 and 2022 were found using a Google Scholar search. By looking through the reference lists of pertinent articles, more papers were found. Studies carried out on animals, publications with a poor level of dependability, and publications published in a language other than English were all disqualified. Depending on how relevant they were to the subject, data were extracted.

Clinical characteristics

The anterior mediastinum has a higher chance of producing MGCTs than the inferior, middle, or posterior mediastinum’s. Young males between the ages of 25 years and 35 years who have mediastinal tumours have 15%-20% of them be MGCTs. At the time of diagnosis, symptoms including dyspnea, coughing, chest discomfort, andweightlossaretypical. Gynecomastia, haemoptysis, fever, nausea, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, and Superior Vena Cava (SVC) syndrome are other symptoms. Mediastinal lymph nodes are where MGCTs most ohen metastasize. Nevertheless, they may also spread to the retroperitoneum, liver, lungs, heart, bone, and central nervous system. Patients should be staged using the proper diagnostic procedures, which may involve whole-body CT scans since extra-mediastinal metastasis is associated with a worse prognosis.

Thymic disorders, thyroid goiter, NUT carcinoma, metastatic melanoma, sarcomas, lymphomas, and metastatic carcinoma to the mediastinum should all be taken into account while making a differential diagnosis. Moreover, a retroperitoneal primary or a testicular primary is connected to dissemination that follows the thoracic duct's route. To assess testicular primary, more testing should be done. The clinical presentation, symptomatology, and prognosis of MGCTs might vary from those of their gonadal counterparts, although their histological and pathological characteristics are the same as those of gonadal GCTs. Despite treatment and surgery, the prognosis for non-semi-noma MGCTs is dismal, with a 5-years OS of 42% to 54%, as shown in table 1. Non-pulmonary visceral metastases and increased -HCG are independent prognostic variables connected to a shorter SR in non-semi-noma MGCTs. In contrast, semi-noma MGCTs have a fantastic prognosis with an OS of more than 90% when treated with the available curative methods.

 

5-Year PFS (95% CI)

Years

No of Patients

5-Year OS (95% CI)

Adra et al. [14]

58% (51% to 63%)

1990-2014

273

73% (67% to 78%)

Gillessen et al. [15]

54% (52% to 56%)

1990-2013

2514

67% (65% to 69%)

IGCCCG

41% (35 to 47)

1975-1990

832

48% (42% to 54%)

Tab. 1. Survival improvements for GCTs at low risk

Tumour markers

Whereas non-semi-noma MGCTs are linked to high levels of AFP, HCG, and LDH and are raised in around 20% of semino- mas. In teratoma, YSTs, and embryonal cancer, AFP levels are increased; in embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, and semi- noma, HCG levels are elevated. LDH lacks specificity, which re-stricts its therapeutic value. Non-semi-noma components have to be checked out when AFP levels in a semi-noma patient are high and continuing to rise; these patients should be treated as non- semi-noma. There are discoveries of novel circulating micro-RNAs in GCTs, such as miR371a-3p. Compared to the traditional blood tumour markers, AFP, HCG, and LDH, which have a combined sensitivity of 50%, their sensitivity and specificity are significantly greater. The plasma of PMGCTs with viable functional malignan- cies that are either non-semi-noma or semi-noma appears to in- clude miR371a-3p, yet it is not seen in patients with mediastinal teratomas. Despite the fact that peripheral blood miRNA synthe- sis and identification in extramedullary GCT, data are lacking.

Pathological characteristics

The suggested mechanisms for extragonadal GCT development to date include interrupted progenitor germ cell migration dur- ing embryogenesis, burnt-out primary, and reverse migration of altered GCs from testes. PMGCTs are categorized as non-semi- nomas and include semi-noma, mixed germ cell tumours, em- bryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, GCT with concomitant haematological malignancy, and teratoma. Mature teratoma is the most common histological subtype in adults, whereas prepu- bertal additional GCTs are mostly composed of teratoma (58%) and YSTs (42%). Without respect to the primary location, GCTs are further divided into 5 categories according to chromosomal alterations and developmental potential. Chromosomes 1p, 4p, and 6q are lost in juvenile teratomas and YSTs. Semi-nomas and non-semi-nomas in adolescent and adult males are classified as type II GCTs. Chromosome losses of 1p, 11p, 13p, and 18p and gains of 7p, 8p, 12p, 21p, and X are frequently observed in these malignancies.

The majority of individuals with primary mediastinal chorio- carcinoma are diagnosed with hematogenous spread. Hence, as compared to other histologic subtypes, it has a worse prognosis. Because of their biochemistry and shape, malignant progenitors of embryonal stem cells are thought to be embryonal cancer cells. YSTs usually contain extraembryonic mesenchymal cells and ma- lignant endodermal cells, which are more common in children. A worse prognosis is linked to YSTs and embryonal cancer.

Teratomas develop from the 3 germinal layers and may differenti- ate into any kind of bodily tissue. Teratoma grading is based on neuroepithelial component quantity and immaturity. Tumours classified as grade 1 must exhibit some degree of immaturity, al- though only 1 or 2 foci may include neuroepithelium. Grade 3 is described as having considerable neuroepithelial immaturity and having neuroepithelial components in 4 or more fields within individual sections. Between classes one and three is grade 2. In MGCTs, mature teratoma accounts for 63% of teratoma diagno- ses, whereas immature teratoma affects 4% of patients. In roughly 33% of instances, teratoma is associated with sarcoma, other ma- lignant GC components, or cancer. The recognized IHC mark- ers for the pathological diagnostic confirmation of GCTs include SALL4, Organic Cation Transporter (OCT) Placental Alkaline Phosphatase (PLAP), Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA), CD30, FP, glycan-3, β-HCG, and cytokeratins. IHC antibodies should be employed to identify the proteins since tumor pheno- type may ohen result in varied and localized staining. Contrarily, cytokeratins are virtually invariably present in embryonal cancer. Although PLAP, EMA, CD30, OCT-4, and SALL-4 might also be positive, it is positive in around half of the cases. According to table 2, YSTs are negative for CD30 and c-kit but positive for cytokeratins and SALL-4. In teratoma PMGCTs, non-germ cell malignant transformation which includes sarcoma and differen- tiation of adenocarcinomas happens more frequently than in pri- mary or gonadal retroperitoneal GCTs.

 

Embryonal Carcinoma

Choriocarcinoma

ImmatureTeratoma

Seminoma

YolkSacTu-mour

PositiveMarkers

Oct 3–4 Sall4 Cd30

Cytokeratin’s Sox2 Nanog

Cytokeratin’s Hcg Glypican-3 Ema

Sall4

Sox2 Sall4 Ema

Cytokeratin’s

Oct 3–4 Sall4 C-kit

Nanog Plap

Cytokeratin’s Sall4 Glypican-3 Afp

NegativeMarkers

Glypican-3 C-kit

C-kit CD30 SOX2 OCT 3-4 NANOG

C-kit NANOG SOX2

OCT 3-4 CD30

Glypican-3 SOX2 CD30

CD30

C-kit SOX2 NANOG OCT 3-4

Tab. 2. IHC in GCTs

The following are the characteristics of the post-chemotherapy residual disease:

10%-20% viable GCTs, 30%-40% teratoma, and 40% to 50% clus- ters of heterogeneous inflammation accompanied by fibrosis and necrosis. The proportion of viable non-teratoma GCTs should be included in a given that pathology reports are among the most sig- nificant predictors of long-term results. A positive prognostic sign is the presence of less than 10% viable tumour cells. To better un- derstand the remaining tumour, if there, a large number of samples should be performed.

Molecular characteristics

Irrespective of the histological subtype, the i(12p) is a chromo- somal abnormality that is seen in around 80% of MGCTs. The de- tection of i(12p) in a specimen with a mediastinal mass may help confirm the MGCT diagnosis. Numerous genes on chromosome 12's short arm may have a role in the development of GCTs. The precise molecular processes behind the onset and development of GCT are yet unknown. The sex chromosomes, chromosomes 1p, 1q, and 6q, and other chromosomal abnormalities, are included. In comparison to testicular GCTs, MGCTs have more tumour mutations and particular harmful oncogene changes. The muta- tions most ohen seen in MGCTs have been identified (figure 1). Compared to seminomas and non-semi-noma TGCTs, non-semi- noma PMGCTs are more likely to have these changes.

A limited amount of research has connected TP53 mutations and MDM2 alterations to cisplatin resistance in GCTs. Testicular GCTs are ohen the site of TP53 mutations, whereas MDM2 am- plifications are primarily seen in the testis. TP53 mutations were found in 16.3% (17/104) of patients in cisplatin-resistant GCTs, according to a retrospective review. Be aware that the research analysis of non-semi-noma MGCT samples revealed TP53 muta- tions in 72.2% (13/18) of the samples. In a recent multi-institu- tional approach on MGCTs, 56% of non-semi-noma tumours had TP53 genomic alterations, and these patients had significantly shorter OS than patients with MGCTs with wild-type TP53. This suggests that patients with MGCTs have a different genomic background, which may help to explain why this patient population has such a poor prognosis. Even more ohen, TP53 mutations have been seen in 91% of individuals with MGCTs linked to he- matologic malignancies.

Diagnosis and pre-treatment evaluation

The differential diagnosis for GCTs in the anterior mediastinum should include thymic diseases, hypothyroidism goiter, and ma- lignancies. Diagnosis and characterization of MGCT might be difficult. Small needle core biopsies are ohen used to make the di- agnosis, and further Immuno Histochemistry (IHC) tests are fre- quently required for confirmation. Wide-ranging tissue collection and careful diagnostic assessment are crucial since non-diagnostic needle biopsies are a major problem. Before surgery, patients of- ten receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, thus the first pathologic assessment is crucial. When administering chemotherapy to pa- tients, it is important to determine the presence of somatic differ- entiation, which portends a poor prognosis since chemotherapy causes tumour necrosis, which can reduce the transformed com- ponent. Moreover, a biopsy is required to diagnose the condition since β-HCG in semi-noma and non-seminoma GCTs is within the normal range or modestly increased. In contrast, if the patient has high AFP readings, the condition may not need to be con- firmed by biopsy. Get a routine Complete Haemogram (CHG) and blood biochemistry panel including AFP, β-HCG, and LDH. Testicular ultrasound testing is required in cases with clinical sus- picion. In cases where the diagnosis is ambiguous, an orchiectomy is required to rule out metastasis from a gonadotropin original. This is true even if the abnormality is likely not a tumor but in- stead of a blemish lesion in the setting of a damaged malignancy.

Extragonadal GCT staging does not follow any approved AJCC TNM guidelines. Before surgery, a pre-treatment CT imaging/ PET scan is necessary to describe the architecture and vascular relationships and to evaluate the disease's spread. When examin- ing neighbouring structural invasion, MRI is a useful tool. Large homogenous soh tissue masses resembling lymphomas character- ize seminomas, but non-semi-noma GCTs are inhomogeneous tumours with boundary abnormalities as a result of their invasive activity. Radiological examinations of teratomas reveal a calcified (20%-43%) multi-lobulated soh tissue mass with a rounded ap- pearance. If the patient is showing worrying symptoms, an MRI of the brain and a bone scan might be performed to check for metas- tasis, which can travel to the brain and vertebrae. Before beginning chemotherapy, patients should get advice on sperm analysis and banking based on their desire to become parents. Chemotherapy may alter sperm count and quality. Also, the inability to conceive puts a person at risk for developing testicular cancer, and DNA repair issues is the cause of the link between poor spermatogenesis and carcinogenesis. More research is needed to determine if can- cer screening is necessary for azoospermic males.

Treatment

For MGCT patients, the cure is the end objective of therapy. Treatment is curative in >80% of semi-noma PMGCT patients with the substantial disease, and in 40%-50% of non-semi-noma MGCT patients when adopting a multimodality strategy. As soon as possible, appropriate therapy should be started. Follow- ing normalized or decreased blood tumour markers, full or virtu- ally complete surgical excision has a significant influence on the course of treatment for individuals with MGCTs. Aher initial chemotherapy, factors including full resection, fewer than 10% of live tumour cells remaining in the resection material, and the IGCCCG's categorization of excellent prognosis are suggestive of a favourable outcome. The prognosis is poorer for subgroups of immature teratoma and non-semi-noma.

To prepare for any future thoracic surgery, the VIP protocol (which substitutes ifosfamide for bleomycin) would be preferable to the usual BEP regimen. The use of bleomycin entails a risk for postoperative morbidity the death, and surgical morbidity. In ge- netically vulnerable individuals, the main factor contributing to the production results of lung problems is oxidation stress, which manifests as interstitial pneumonitis and progresses to fibrosis. The DLCO test is used to quickly and easily show that bleomycin- induced lung damage exists in the subclinical stage. If the diffusion capacity drops under 30%-35% of the original amount, treatment should be stopped, and dosages shouldn't exceed 400 units since doing so increases the risk of pulmonary damage. The anaesthe- siologist has to be informed of bleomycin exposure in order for them to take precautionary measures, such as limiting fluid replen- ishment over the course of the therapy and employing a low pro- portion of inspired oxygen.

Four chemotherapy rounds followed by post-chemotherapy surgi- cal excision are advised for non-semi-noma histology. Following chemotherapy, surgery is essential because the remaining tumour may still include immature or mature GCs or teratoma with so- matic differentiation, all of which are associated with a poor prognosis. Because salvage chemotherapy has a poor response rate, an increase in malignant tumours following chemotherapy may not exclude effective treatment by surgical excision. The in- effectiveness of normal or high-dose regimens makes treating recurrent illnesses difficult. While it is not used to treat primary non-semi-noma GCTs, radiation treatment is used to treat certain diseases, such as brain metastases. When there is disease develop- ment despite tumour markers decreasing aher therapy, developing teratoma condition is a medical entity that must be looked at. It is characterized by an expanding mediastinal mass and worsening cardiopulmonary function. For efficient therapy of developing teratoma syndrome, early detection is crucial. Early surgical sur- gery is advised in these circumstances and is linked to better re- sults. In MGCTs that are resistant to chemotherapy, an aggressive surgical operation could also be necessary.

For individuals with respectable tumours and negative tumour markers, upfront surgery is a possibility. Non-semi-noma MGCT is regarded as a poor prognostic factor, suggesting a poor outcome for patients receiving HDCT and PBSCT. As a result, several specialists do not favor employing HDCT in MGCTs that do not include semi-noma. However, the majority of patients did not respond well to salvage HDCT and PBSCT. Further data on HDCT and PBSCT are required to more accurately identify the individuals who will respond to treatment since this patient group is usually omitted from HDCT trials. Surgery must be done on the remaining masses with a curative purpose aher HDCT and PBSCT, perhaps at high-volume facilities to enhance results.

Semi-noma MGCTs patients had a comparable prognosis to go- nadal semi-noma patients, with a 5-year SR of more than 90%. IGCCC risk categorization assigns MGCTs without non-pulmo- nary metastases a favourable risk rating. Semi-noma MGCTs have a favourable prognosis because of their exceptional radiation and chemotherapy sensitivity. Adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to initial surgical excision is a feasible therapeutic option for small, resectable tumours in asymptomatic patients. If initially complete tumour eradication is not achievable, the best course of treatment is chemotherapy, followed by radiation therapy or surgery for the residual tumour. A three-cycle BEP regimen is advised for those with a good IGCCCG risk. A suggested four cycles of BEP and VIP are indicated for individuals with a moderate IGCCCG risk. While chemotherapy is the recommended course of action, radia- tion treatment to the mediastinum is beneficial for those without a debilitating disease who have strong contraindications to che-motherapy (35-50 Gray).

The histology of the underlying tumor and the extent of the re- maining illness determine how post-chemotherapy residual mass- es should be managed. If the FDG PET scan is negative, it can be useful to rule out any remaining viable semi-noma. The choice of therapy should not, however, be based only on the results of a positive PET scan because of the test's limited positive predictive value and potential for overtreatment. If surgery is not an option, residual viable illness needs chemotherapy or radiation treatment. Progressing lesions aher chemotherapy needs either surgery, if fea- sible, or salvage chemotherapy. Surgery of residual masses is rec- ommended in patients with post-chemotherapy non-semi-noma MGCTs if it is feasible. Due to teratomas' reported low FDG ab- sorption, PET scans in these patients are only of extremely limited benefit.

Surgery alone may successfully treat mature primary mediastinal teratomas, and the prognosis is favourable. Depending on the kind and degree of the changed tumour, teratomas with somatic transformation are either surgically removed or treated with che- motherapy. Before every round of chemotherapy, serum tumour marker testing should typically be done. Above all, referral of pa- tients to centres with experience in handling GCTs should be tak- en into consideration since such facilities are linked with notice- ably improved results when treating patients with poor prognoses.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and molecular characteristics of semi-noma and non- semi-noma MGCTs differ, making MGCTs a heterogeneous en- tity. Because of their poor chemotherapy sensitivity and high like- lihood of recurrence, non-semi-noma MGCTs continue to have one of the worst prognosis outlooks among GCTs. To enhance cure rates in this patient group, integrated, multidisciplinary care is essential. When given a multimodal treatment plan, semi-noma MGCTs have a 5-year OS rate above 90% and a favourable prog- nosis comparable to that of their gonadal counterpart. To apply treatment techniques and eventually enhance patient outcomes, it would be advantageous to identify biological and genetic markers that predict therapy responses. Moreover, working with facilities experienced in treating GCTs is linked to noticeably improved results.

References

  1. Takami H, Graffeo CS, Perry A, Ohno M, Ishida J, et al. Histopathology, and prognosis of GCTs metastatic to the brain: Cohort study. J Neuroon- 2021;154:121-130.

  2. Lew CZ, Liu HC, Hou JY, Huang TH, Yeh Pediatric extracranial germ, cell tumors: Review of clinics and perspectives in application of autolo-, gous stem cell transplantation. Cancers. 2023;15:1998.

  3. Kubota Y, Seki M, Kawai T, Isobe T, Yoshida M, et Comprehensive ge-, netic analysis of pediatric GCTs identifies potential drug targets. Commun Biol. 2020;3:544.

  4. Marker DF, Pearce TM. Germ cell tumors of the central nervous sys-, tem: A brief review and site-specific considerations. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2023;40:47-51.

  5. Fonseca A, Lobo J, Hazard FK, Gell J, Nicholls PK, et Advancing clini-, clinical and translational research in germ cell tumours (GCT): Recommenda-, tions from the Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium. Br J Cancer. 2022;127:1577-1583.

  6. Wyvekens N, Sholl LM, Yang Y, Tran I, Vasudevaraja V, et al. Molecular, correlates of male germ cell tumors with overgrowth of components re-, sembling somatic malignancies. Mod Pathol. 2022;35:1966-1973.

  7. Takami H, Fukuoka K, Fukushima S, Nakamura T, Mukasa A, et al. In-, tegrated clinical, histopathological, and molecular data analysis of 190, central nervous system germ cell tumors from the iGCT Neu- rooncol. 2019;21:1565-1577.

  8. Urbini M, Schepisi G, Bleve S, Virga A, Gianni C, et Primary mediastinal, and testicular germ cell tumors in adolescents and adults: A comparison, of genomic alterations and clinical implications. Cancers. 2021;13:5223.

  9. Sohn A, Moran Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2023;40:37-46.

  10. Caso R, Jones GD, Bains MS, Hsu M, Tan KS, et Outcomes after mul-, tidisciplinary management of primary mediastinal germ cell tumors. Ann Surg. 2021;274:1099-1107.

  11. Siegmund SE, Mehra R, Acosta An update on diagnostic tissue-based, biomarkers in testicular tumors. Hum Pathol. 2023;133:32-55.

  12. Kaur B. Pathology of malignant ovarian germ cell tumours. Diagn Histo- 2020;26:289-297.

  13. Fujii H, Yamada Y, Yamamura K, Ishida Y, Tsujimura M, et al. A case of, vasculogenic mesenchymal tumor in the mediastinum: Whole-exome se-, quencing reveals origin from pre-existing germ cell Virchows Arch. 2023;482:923-927.

  14. Adra N, Althouse SK, Liu H, Brames MJ, Hanna NH, et al. Prognostic, factors in patients with poor-risk germ-cell tumors: A retrospective analy-, sis of the Indiana University experience from 1990 to 2014. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:875-879.

  15. Gillessen S, Sauvé N, Collette L, Daugaard G, de Wit R, et al. Predict-, ing outcomes in men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, (NSGCT): Results from the IGCCCG update consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1563-1574.

+443308224832
Awards Nomination oncologyradiotherapy scopus oncologyradiotherapy pubmed

Editors List

  • RAOUi Yasser

    Senior Medical Physicist

  • Ahmed Hussien Alshewered

    University of Basrah College of Medicine, Iraq

  • Sudhakar Tummala

    Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering SRM University – AP, Andhra Pradesh

     

     

     

  • Alphonse Laya

    Supervisor of Biochemistry Lab and PhD. students of Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry and Department of Chemis

     

  • Fava Maria Giovanna

Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 558

Onkologia i Radioterapia received 558 citations as per Google Scholar report

Onkologia i Radioterapia peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

  • Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Scimago
  • SCOPUS
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • MIAR
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • Medical Project Poland
  • PUBMED
  • Cancer Index
  • Gdansk University of Technology, Ministry Points 20